Search found 4 matches

by Mike90
Thu Jan 01, 2015 8:26 pm
Forum: APBRmetrics
Topic: Flaws with RAPM
Replies: 63
Views: 63964

Re: Flaws with RAPM

You're right - 4.8 fouls per 36 minutes is pretty high. Maybe that's the only reason.
by Mike90
Thu Jan 01, 2015 3:47 pm
Forum: APBRmetrics
Topic: Flaws with RAPM
Replies: 63
Views: 63964

Re: Flaws with RAPM

Nick Collison's RAPM numbers are more interesting to me than Collins. In the 14-year RAPM data set, Collison has a +3.9, which ranks him 37th out of the 1383 players listed. He's in the top 3% - truly elite. Below are his games started, minutes per game with team rank in parentheses, and team's reco...
by Mike90
Wed Dec 31, 2014 12:56 pm
Forum: APBRmetrics
Topic: Flaws with RAPM
Replies: 63
Views: 63964

Re: Flaws with RAPM

Good, metrics should be criticized. Understanding where a metric fails is necessary for correcting it. Long-term APM is a fantastic metric, particularly for measuring defensive impact, but we should still examine the outliers and try to understand why guys like Amir Johnson, Nick Collison, and Jason...
by Mike90
Tue Dec 30, 2014 8:58 pm
Forum: APBRmetrics
Topic: Flaws with RAPM
Replies: 63
Views: 63964

Re: Flaws with RAPM

I have a hunch that the surprisingly high plus-minus figures for some low-minute guys are caused mostly by selection bias, as in a coach purposely plays his specialists only in situations where he thinks they would do well and sits them otherwise. Example: Jason Collins is considered a great interio...