Search found 416 matches
- Thu Nov 17, 2022 4:45 pm
- Forum: APBRmetrics
- Topic: 26-year RAPM and updates to the aging curve
- Replies: 17
- Views: 9694
Re: 26-year RAPM and updates to the aging curve
- Jordan/Kemp/Malone/Olajuwon. Obviously this '97-onwards data isn't covering their entire careers. Kemp, certainly, wasn't great anywhere but in Seattle. Jordan wasn't quite as good with the Wizards, etc These arguments are null since it's obvious you didn't factor everyone's age back in after adj...
- Thu Nov 17, 2022 10:31 am
- Forum: APBRmetrics
- Topic: 26-year RAPM and updates to the aging curve
- Replies: 17
- Views: 9694
Re: 26-year RAPM and updates to the aging curve
- Jordan/Kemp/Malone/Olajuwon. Obviously this '97-onwards data isn't covering their entire careers. Kemp, certainly, wasn't great anywhere but in Seattle. Jordan wasn't quite as good with the Wizards, etc These arguments are null since it's obvious you didn't factor everyone's age back in after adj...
- Tue Dec 03, 2019 12:04 am
- Forum: APBRmetrics
- Topic: Reconstructing Box Plus/Minus
- Replies: 163
- Views: 216905
Re: Reconstructing Box Plus/Minus
League average adjustment.
Play position adjustment like guard - forward - center or 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5.
Per-game ranking adjusted by pace (different than per100 poss) with a games played cutoff instead of total (in the case of Vorp).
This should provide a better ranking.
Play position adjustment like guard - forward - center or 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5.
Per-game ranking adjusted by pace (different than per100 poss) with a games played cutoff instead of total (in the case of Vorp).
This should provide a better ranking.
- Sat Jun 30, 2018 3:53 pm
- Forum: APBRmetrics
- Topic: Open source historical RAPM data and code
- Replies: 12
- Views: 38158
Re: Open source historical RAPM data and code
I might be confused. Are you talking about his alpha=2900? If so that number sounds are right as alpha in sklearn is N/2 * lambda in R where N is your number of observations. If not then yeah my bad I thought you were talking about something else. Yes, I'm talking about that "2900" and th...
- Sat Jun 30, 2018 7:29 am
- Forum: APBRmetrics
- Topic: Open source historical RAPM data and code
- Replies: 12
- Views: 38158
Re: Open source historical RAPM data and code
After further investigation, your lambda (alpha in your code) values are too high. As a result of that you punish players with relative low possessions even more. You should change your sequence to come up with a better one. I would focus on the cross validation code there. I don't know how python ...
- Sat Jun 30, 2018 12:24 am
- Forum: APBRmetrics
- Topic: Open source historical RAPM data and code
- Replies: 12
- Views: 38158
Re: Open source historical RAPM data and code
Nice job! Also very kind for you to share all this code. You are the first to share such code at this scale in this forum. So thank you so much for that. At first I must say I'm not a computer scientist, I'm no analyst, I'm not getting any money. I'm just a basketball fan (not even that nowadays) an...
- Fri Jun 30, 2017 11:44 pm
- Forum: APBRmetrics
- Topic: GM adjusted plus - minus?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 9745
Re: GM adjusted plus - minus?
Almost impossible because of the lack of data. Any work on this would likely be statistically insignificant. Results would probably lie between the residuals.
- Fri Jun 30, 2017 11:37 pm
- Forum: APBRmetrics
- Topic: BPM - RPM Blend
- Replies: 15
- Views: 27292
Re: BPM - RPM Blend
2/3 - 1/3 ratio is not ideal but should be close enough for predicting team wins of the next season.
- Mon Jun 12, 2017 10:21 am
- Forum: APBRmetrics
- Topic: Hot Hand
- Replies: 9
- Views: 21034
Re: Hot Hand
If we had to call upon maths to prove everything and advance that way as the human race, our race would already be extinct. Even now you can see some completely conflicting findings on most of the new research areas and both sides claim they have statistical evidence for it. You just need to look fo...
- Sun Jun 11, 2017 7:55 pm
- Forum: APBRmetrics
- Topic: Hot Hand
- Replies: 9
- Views: 21034
Re: Hot Hand
If hot hand is not proven by analytics it's only because analytics are not there yet. No one can convince me there's no such thing as hot hand with the usual very poor statistical arguments. I'm a former basketball player that played as an SG at school-level and I know the whole deal. If these so-ca...
- Fri Jun 09, 2017 7:02 am
- Forum: APBRmetrics
- Topic: BPM - RPM Blend
- Replies: 15
- Views: 27292
Re: BPM - RPM Blend
I didn't mean to doubt it's objectiveness. Your reasoning sounds fair. I just wanted to know your exact purpose
. I mean like predicting wins, predicting spread, individual player impact...

- Thu Jun 08, 2017 9:07 pm
- Forum: APBRmetrics
- Topic: BPM - RPM Blend
- Replies: 15
- Views: 27292
Re: BPM - RPM Blend
Objective?
- Sun Jun 04, 2017 10:09 pm
- Forum: APBRmetrics
- Topic: Why are possessions et al. estimated using crude formulae?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 8528
Re: Why are possessions et al. estimated using crude formula
I always use the first formula. In some cases, I used even more sophisticated formulas. I don't like "too much estimation" or "bias". I always try to minimize that factor in any scenerio.
- Sat Jun 03, 2017 5:44 pm
- Forum: APBRmetrics
- Topic: 2017 Finals Predictions
- Replies: 20
- Views: 22563
Re: 2017 Finals Predictions
I would say 4-0 if I saw this thread before the first game and I'm saying 4-0 again after the first game. Last year I thought it was the common non-empirical 51%-49% ratio in favour of Cavs for me. Durant is better than people and +/- based metrics give credit for. Durant-Curry-Thompson-Green would ...
- Sun May 28, 2017 11:40 am
- Forum: APBRmetrics
- Topic: Setting Up Excel File for RAPM
- Replies: 34
- Views: 55693
Re: Setting Up Excel File for RAPM
There have been people contacting me via pm or here in this thread or older threads about how to calculate RAPM and getting the data ready for regression in the past years. I assume there are still going to be some people interested in how to calculate RAPM whether they are forum members or they com...