Thanks.Evan Turner - Boston
Marion - Cleveland
Bazemore - Atlanta
CDR - LA Clippers
They still don't appear on the teams' rosters :/
Thanks.Evan Turner - Boston
Marion - Cleveland
Bazemore - Atlanta
CDR - LA Clippers
Code: Select all
Andray Blatche Jan Vesely
Ramon Sessions Kenyon Martin
Jordan Crawford Mirosl. Raduljica
Ray Allen Rashard Lewis
Elton Brand Earl Clark
Michael Beasley Al Harrington
Dante Cunningham Toney Douglas
James Anderson Byron Mullens
Jermaine O'Neal Gustavo Ayon
Kent Bazemore Nazr Mohammed
Andrew Bynum Marshon Brooks
E'Twaun Moore Hedo Turkoglu
Derek Fisher Greg Stiemsma
Nando Decolo Rasual Butler
Mid-50s is not really that different from what Vegas says (56.5) so I don't see how that's a headscratcher. All numbers on my site haven't been updated since ~march, so that might make a slight difference. Also, but I'm not sure about this point, the RAPM on my site may be coach adjusted. Brooks' very high rating in turn lowers the RAPM of all OKC playersjimmytonic wrote:I'm making a projection by taking the average each team's WP and RAPM projection, and I'm getting oddly low records for the OKC Thunder. Both have the Thunder in the mid-50s, and while there are a number of teams whose projections are slightly off from the range I would expect, this is the only one I struggle to believe. J.E., could you help explain why Durant and Ibaka both slipped in RAPM last year while Fisher shot up by 2.8 netRAPM? Was 2013 an outlier for Durant? In his past 4 seasons, his RAPM falls within 5-6 for 3 of those, including the last season, while in 2013 it jumped up to 8. Does it make more sense to expect it to return to that level regardless, now that Fisher is gone?
I've tried giving the Thunder a generous minutes distribution and it doesn't really make a difference, yet I just find it hard to believe that this team, now expecting to have Westbrook for a full season, will somehow drop ~3-4 wins. Am I underrated the impact of losing Sefolosha and Fisher? I'm inclined to think a further year of development for Lamb, along with a increase in total minutes for him, RJackson, and Westbrook would offset that impact, but I don't want to blindly dismiss what my projections tell me.
They had 31 PWins last season. They went 21-29 under Cheeks, then 8-24 under Loyer. Van Gundy is probably a lot better than both of them, esp. Loyer. KCP and Drummond are young and should improve next season. I can definitely see why their O/U is so "high"Crow wrote:Pistons at 36.5? I'd favor the under.
What does RiRAPM mean/stand for?talkingpractice wrote:the gotbuckets RAPMs are a RiRAPM variant that we provide
I think I looked it up for a different thread; if coaching RAPM is to be believed, van Gundy alone would have made the Pistons just about an average team last year.Crow wrote:Pistons at 36.5? I'd favor the under.