In general the talking heads are primarily interested in telling stories and sounding good, I'm not sure you can expect something like that to have substantive meaning. (People love stuff like Lawler's law, but "more points wins" isn't exactly a novel insight into basketball.)Rd11490 wrote:Good point. When I started thinking about this problem, all I wanted was a way to measure the term "spacing" that so many talking heads like to use. i.e. Jimmy Butler and Taj Gibson will kill the Timberwolves offensive spacing.
Let's say that I don't know anything about basketball, and I'm watching a game. What kind of stuff would I see that indicates that a team is 'spacing the floor well' or 'spacing the floor poorly.'
Naively, it seems like the primary game plan for a team should be to look for open corner 3s and shots from the restricted area.
Is 'spacing' about the quality and frequency of 3-point shots as suggested in the article that this thread started with? Maybe spacing is about the quality and frequency of FGAs outside the paint and the low post, in general. Should we be looking for off-the-ball runs into open space? Maybe it's about the offence making small movements that force large responses from the defence.