Page 13 of 15

Re: '22-23 Commentary

Posted: Thu Mar 30, 2023 2:35 am
by Crow
The more detail you know or think you know, the greater temptation probably to alter lineups seeking edge.

People probably think they know a lot from the last 5-10 plays but they are probably on average only about half right. Tiny samples have lots of randomness (favorable and not).

Re: '22-23 Commentary

Posted: Thu Mar 30, 2023 2:53 am
by Crow
Pacers now 1-7 recently. Worse win% than the 3-16 before All-Star break but not as long. That's a lot of losing for a team "with potential".

Re: '22-23 Commentary

Posted: Thu Mar 30, 2023 2:28 pm
by Crow
Mavs with just over 50% chance to make play-in according to BRef. Under 20% of making playoffs.

Re: '22-23 Commentary

Posted: Thu Mar 30, 2023 3:16 pm
by Crow
Hardy has shot well in recent months. Doesn't do a whole lot else so the BPM is still weak, not much above replacement level.

Kidd / Mavs have used him in close to 200 lineups in his 600 plus minutes. No lineup used 1 minute per game played and only 1 over 30 seconds. Good with much of bench and Irving. With Doncic, very mild positive. I'd try to find a more defined usage pattern next season.

Re: '22-23 Commentary

Posted: Thu Mar 30, 2023 4:37 pm
by Crow
Thunder, 780 lineups used so far. Spurs 909. Spurs may not quite make it to 1000 but there is a decent chance. 900 or 800 is plenty rando / suboptimal for performance and learning. 900 so far means about 12 brand new, never before used lineups per game throughout the season.

5 other teams over 600 but less than 725. The lowest are a bit below 300 lineups used.



Spurs just overtook Thunder for 29th on attendance. Could change again but Thunder may stay last. Down from 27th last season.

Re: '22-23 Commentary

Posted: Thu Mar 30, 2023 5:28 pm
by Crow
Celtics at #2 may get Heat in first round. 2-2 in regular season. #1 probably gets Hawks. Celtics were 2-0 against them.

Re: '22-23 Commentary

Posted: Thu Mar 30, 2023 5:49 pm
by Crow
A very average team will have a minutes qualified +3 or better on BPM, a qualified +2 or better, a +1 or better and 1 non-minutes qualified at one of these levels. Good teams will have guys higher than these minimum performance levels or more of them or both.

Nuggets have the first 3 but not a 4th. All their superiority over average by BPM is entirely based on Jokic's level.

Celtics exceed at all of the first 4 and have 3 more. So do Griz.

Bucks have all 4 and exceed on first 3 but have no more.

So 2 with great depth, 2 with just average depth but a really great player (far over +6 BPM).

The last 7 champions have averaged 1.3 really great players and 5.7 total over +1. 2016-17 Warriors and 2019-20 Lakers had 2 really greats. Only last season's Warriors missed on the qualifying best player (Curry at just +5.8).

Celtics and Griz barely achieve on best player but have the depth. Bucks and Nuggets clearly miss on quality depth. Some concern for all.

Only 2019-20 Lakers did not meet both criteria of a great player and a bare minimum of 4 qualifiers over +1 (had 3).

Quality out to 7th or 9th man may matter a bit but has not been reviewed.

Re: '22-23 Commentary

Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2023 2:13 am
by Crow
Wizards lead most of way but lose the 4th quarter big for the L. 6 for 29 from Avdija and J Davis overwhelms Kispert's career game. Analyze what went wrong with roster, coaching and analysis and try again next season.

Re: '22-23 Commentary

Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2023 8:20 pm
by Crow
Popovich used 16 brand new lineups last game. If he averages that over the next 4 games, he will break the 1000 lineups in a season barrier. An incredibly dubious achievement.

Re: '22-23 Commentary

Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2023 5:15 pm
by Crow
17 of 20 most used Pistons lineups are negative for 2nd year in row. Was 60-65% negative in 2 years before that.

Seems like they need different design, personnel, management, advice,,,

5 most used Bogdanovic pairs were all bad but they re-signed him, held on to him.

19 of 20 most used pairs overall negative.


1107 quads used. Yfy?

Hayes - Burks - Bey - Duren was the immediately obvious quad to check from pair data. +32 / 48 min... in 49 minutes of test. 75th most used! F! Follow the numbers that work til they don't!

82% of 50 most used quads negative! 95% of the 20 most used negative! Stop trying at least the horrible!

Re: '22-23 Commentary

Posted: Fri Apr 07, 2023 2:05 am
by Crow
Pistons under Troy Weaver: 59W-175L.

Pistons under D Casey: 79W-221L.

Re: '22-23 Commentary

Posted: Sat Apr 08, 2023 3:49 pm
by Crow
Mavs not in top 10 in West.

Biggest / strong Irving lineup only used 3.5 minutes per game. 2nd biggest was a loser. Biggest quad over 10 minutes but could / should have been over 20 min / gm.

Bottom 1/3rd on all defensive factors and probably worse after trade.

Elite on 3 offensive factors and 2 of 3 Moreyball components but dead last in offensive rebounding and bottom 1/3rd on shots at rim.

-3 on actual wins - expected.

Maximum of 8 current players under contract for next season at this time. 2-3 starters may not return along with former starters.

Mavs were oldest team to not make post-season.


Doncic has missed 17.5% of career games.

Re: '22-23 Commentary

Posted: Sat Apr 08, 2023 11:13 pm
by Crow
Julian Champagnie, over 20 pts in 3 of last 4 games. RFA this summer I believe, unless Spurs act today or tomorrow.

Re: '22-23 Commentary

Posted: Sun Apr 09, 2023 2:04 am
by Crow
Spurs at 976 lineups with 1 to play. So they are very unlikely to hit 100. But 985 ish will be darn close and draws the same reaction from me.


Update: 985 it is. An average of 12 brand new lineups EVERY GAME for the season.

Re: '22-23 Commentary

Posted: Sun Apr 09, 2023 7:21 pm
by Crow
Last day of regular season.

Average 3pta per game is down 1 from last season. The long upward streak is broken, temporarily or long-term?

After two years of relatively low ftas, they are up again.

Highest efg% and offensive efficiency ever and by pretty big margins.