They say it's the biggest loss by a defending champion in NBA playoff history.
Ranked by biggest gains (by Wolves) and losses (Den) in series BPM during this one game (of 6).
Showing GameBPM and gains/losses from their previous 5-game rates.
tm PER WS/48 BPM e480
Bos 17.0 .167 2.34 1.21
Cle 13.7 .050 0.41 .79
tot 15.4 .108 1.38 1.00
Ind 17.7 .126 1.55 1.12
NYK 15.9 .084 0.51 .88
tot 16.8 .105 1.03 1.00
tm PER WS/48 BPM e480
Min 15.6 .134 2.50 1.16
Den 13.7 .076 1.19 .84
tot 14.6 .105 1.84 1.00
Dal 14.2 .102 2.25 1.00
OKC 15.2 .107 2.19 1.00
tot 14.7 .104 2.22 1.00
BPM says the West series were stronger; PER and WS say the opposite.
Dal and OKC scored the same (636) points in 6 games. Shouldn't they have the same totals?
Depleted Knicks' progression through long minutes and decline. BPM is shown for regular season, playoffs round 1 and 2.
Other stats concur on the ups and downs.
Hart and Brunson were pretty beat up in the last couple games, to account for their minutes dropoff.
I just wonder how the Pacers' BPM are affected by the sizable dropoff in Knicks' strength, from the season thru playoffs.
Mike G wrote: ↑Fri May 24, 2024 12:35 am
Depleted Knicks' progression through long minutes and decline. BPM is shown for regular season, playoffs round 1 and 2.
Other stats concur on the ups and downs.
Hart and Brunson were pretty beat up in the last couple games, to account for their minutes dropoff.
I just wonder how the Pacers' BPM are affected by the sizable dropoff in Knicks' strength, from the season thru playoffs.
BPM accounts for who is playing for the opponent. It judges the strength of the opponent by their regular season average BPM times their actual minutes played in the game. So it counts for people being out or playing lower minutes, but it does not account for players playing injured.
Developer of Box Plus/Minus
APBRmetrics Forum Administrator Twitter.com/DSMok1
DSMok1 wrote: ↑Fri May 24, 2024 11:23 am
BPM accounts for who is playing for the opponent. It judges the strength of the opponent by their regular season average BPM times their actual minutes played in the game. So it counts for people being out or playing lower minutes, but it does not account for players playing injured.
Yes, and I have been generating team BPM to judge which series are more competitive. It's the only stat that accounts for the competition.
And historically most (or all?) players are not as effective beyond a certain number of minutes. For some it may be 30, for others 40. But game after game of overuse will almost certainly dent one's effectiveness.
The Knicks ran their main guys relentlessly in round 1, and by the 2nd round they had to go with their absolute worst player during the regular season -- Alec Burks -- who became absolutely their best player vs. Indiana.
I guess we need a study on how extra playoff minutes affects player proficiency.
If the Mavs (Dal 3-1 Min) defeat the Wolves in the WCF, then the team higher in the alphabet (by city) will have won 5 of the 7 Western series.
In the East, teams closer to A went 7-0 vs the Z-tending teams.
The ascent of Luka Doncic in these playoffs. Data from saved tables in the playoff threads.
Column 1 is the number of games in the measuring sample, for PER etc.
rd indicates the playoff round(s)
I have seen multiple references to "only Doncic and Jordan have career playoff ppg >30"
However a few others have peaked over 30 ppg, before inevitably tailing off later:
This sample includes some who were in more playoffs early or late in their careers. Not necessarily representative or comprehensive, but maybe close.
At age 30-32-34-36 they avg 95-91-85-80% of their peak cumulative ppg; and these % are applied to Luka's future (* 32.5).
LeBron and Durant both peaked around 29 ppg.
Alternative "standings" for the playoffs. Based on point differential, the cumulative margins. For example, Den lost to Min by avg 5.2; Min lost to Dal by 5.9 -- so Nuggs were cumulatively 11.1 worse than Mavs.
West -pts East -pts
Dal 0.0 Bos 0.0
OKC 0.2 Orl 3.2
Min 5.9 Ind 6.6
LAC 7.0 Mil 9.1
Den 11.1 NYK 10.8
LAL 13.4 Phl 11.0
NOP 16.3 Cle 12.2
Phx 21.1 Mia 16.3
Yes, the Magics lost by minus-4.5 to the Cavs, who lost by 7.7 to the Celts.
By this method, very few were anywhere close. 2 finalists +1 or maybe 2.
Imo almost eveyone (or everyone) not in Finals should vigorously study options for change / improvement. And in most cases it will not be near enough to achieve ultimate goal next season. So... some should shoot for a more distant future, maybe very distant.
Philly trade Embid? Cavs, Mitchell? Heat, Butler? Suns their entire big 3? Lakers trade everybody? I could mention the Clippers but they have been irrelevant for so long... I am already on record for a Nuggets blow-up of all but 2 (and maybe a few minor pieces).
I should say though that this method will inherently exaggerate the differences from very top to very bottom. Simple transience applies more to winning probability (but not always) than to matchup margins.