Re: Computing fake RAPM for players of the 90s
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 5:40 pm
Out of curiosity, why not just use Daniel's ASPM as the prior? Or would it make any difference?
Analysis of basketball through objective evidence
http://www.apbr.org/metrics/
The fake lineup data is set up in such a way that starter/non_starter distribution is similar to those of games after 2000, which had similar quarter outcomes.colts18 wrote:Does this RAPM adjust for quarter? Ex: Starters get less credit for 2nd quarter since they play less in the 2nd quarter? How does it deal with games that are blowouts in the 4th? Does this also adjust for strong opponents?
Did you add a variable to adjust for height like for example 7 footers have higher Defensive RAPM than a 6 footer?
Heycolts18 wrote:J.E., is there a chance you will do the fake RAPM for the 80's? B-R has quarter by quarter and MP since 1986 so I would assume its possible to do it from 86-90.
No, just a fan of the lowly WizardsJ.E. wrote:Heycolts18 wrote:J.E., is there a chance you will do the fake RAPM for the 80's? B-R has quarter by quarter and MP since 1986 so I would assume its possible to do it from 86-90.
It's possible but unlikely. Had I known that quarter by quarter score and MP was available only since 1986 I would have included those from the start. Are you an 80s Pistons fan?
http://www.apbr.org/metrics/viewtopic.p ... 067#p13656colts18 wrote:What's the R value between these fake RAPM's and the real RAPM?
I believe that's for 01-11J.E. wrote:R^2 for real RAPM and fake RAPM is ~0.25. Fake RAPM has everyone even closer together than RAPM does, so it's really hard to get a good rating when being on a bad team etc.
I think R value was from the first version of the stat that didn't adjust minutes played to the scoring margin entering the quarter.sideshowbob wrote:http://www.apbr.org/metrics/viewtopic.p ... 067#p13656colts18 wrote:What's the R value between these fake RAPM's and the real RAPM?
I believe that's for 01-11J.E. wrote:R^2 for real RAPM and fake RAPM is ~0.25. Fake RAPM has everyone even closer together than RAPM does, so it's really hard to get a good rating when being on a bad team etc.
Rodman at #4 by this method and time period when first published seems worth noting given the past controversy about his relative ranking / greatness. The ranking is now 9th in the current data set.J.E. wrote:10 year fake RAPM (91-00) give the following ranking
Jordan (+4.5)
Bird (+4)
Magic (+3.8)
Rodman
Shaq
Pippen
DRobinson
Wayne Cooper
Mourning
Cliff Levingston
Eddie Jones
Doc Rivers
Danny Ainge
Dan Majerle
Sam Perkins
Penny Hardaway (+2.6)