The Diminishing Returns of Shooting (cherokee_ACB, 2008)
Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 9:34 pm
cherokee_ACB
Joined: 22 Mar 2006
Posts: 157
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 11:07 am Post subject: Reply with quote
More team by team rebounding analysis. As I said, there's a small correlation between the rebounding ratios of opposing lineups. With which teams does this happen the most?
Code:
team dr or
SAS 0.228 0.234
POR 0.267 0.113
SEA 0.224 0.101
MEM 0.043 0.234
NOH 0.194 0.076
PHI 0.114 0.145
NJN 0.131 0.125
CLE 0.221 0.035
TOR 0.105 0.148
HOU 0.098 0.139
LAC 0.048 0.180
IND 0.164 0.062
LAL 0.083 0.116
MIA 0.163 0.009
DEN 0.137 0.022
ORL 0.079 0.067
PHX 0.205 -0.064
MIN 0.119 0.014
GSW -0.010 0.128
ATL -0.032 0.143
WAS 0.135 -0.039
SAC -0.038 0.125
UTA 0.048 0.030
BOS 0.077 -0.023
CHA -0.106 0.154
NYK -0.078 0.071
CHI 0.051 -0.069
DAL -0.053 0.019
MIL -0.082 0.022
DET -0.246 -0.036
Those are the coefficients of correlation between the sum of ratios for one team, and its opponent. Dallas, Milwaukee and Detroit look like mismatch teams; Popovich loves to adapt.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CareyScurry
Joined: 29 Jul 2005
Posts: 8
PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2009 8:16 pm Post subject: Reply with quote
Quote:
Do you mean "to overstate"?
I can only presume they did...
So - there are (very, very likely) diminishing returns to rebounding. What other ramifications are there with this - for instance, might we that find lineups with a concentration of unusually good defensive rebounders (who will collect less DRBs than you'd naively expect) in turn produce better defensive outcomes than you'd expect a priori (as some of their energies directed normally directed toward board work are instead focused on other defensive efforts), etc...?
Joined: 22 Mar 2006
Posts: 157
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 11:07 am Post subject: Reply with quote
More team by team rebounding analysis. As I said, there's a small correlation between the rebounding ratios of opposing lineups. With which teams does this happen the most?
Code:
team dr or
SAS 0.228 0.234
POR 0.267 0.113
SEA 0.224 0.101
MEM 0.043 0.234
NOH 0.194 0.076
PHI 0.114 0.145
NJN 0.131 0.125
CLE 0.221 0.035
TOR 0.105 0.148
HOU 0.098 0.139
LAC 0.048 0.180
IND 0.164 0.062
LAL 0.083 0.116
MIA 0.163 0.009
DEN 0.137 0.022
ORL 0.079 0.067
PHX 0.205 -0.064
MIN 0.119 0.014
GSW -0.010 0.128
ATL -0.032 0.143
WAS 0.135 -0.039
SAC -0.038 0.125
UTA 0.048 0.030
BOS 0.077 -0.023
CHA -0.106 0.154
NYK -0.078 0.071
CHI 0.051 -0.069
DAL -0.053 0.019
MIL -0.082 0.022
DET -0.246 -0.036
Those are the coefficients of correlation between the sum of ratios for one team, and its opponent. Dallas, Milwaukee and Detroit look like mismatch teams; Popovich loves to adapt.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CareyScurry
Joined: 29 Jul 2005
Posts: 8
PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2009 8:16 pm Post subject: Reply with quote
Quote:
Do you mean "to overstate"?
I can only presume they did...
So - there are (very, very likely) diminishing returns to rebounding. What other ramifications are there with this - for instance, might we that find lineups with a concentration of unusually good defensive rebounders (who will collect less DRBs than you'd naively expect) in turn produce better defensive outcomes than you'd expect a priori (as some of their energies directed normally directed toward board work are instead focused on other defensive efforts), etc...?