Effects of a team's schedule
Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2019 4:07 pm
I had this thought the other day comparing the Pistons' post-ASB schedule to the Hornets' post-ASB schedule: Does finishing the season "strong" with an easy schedule have better effects on team chemistry and player happiness than finishing the season "struggling" with a very difficult schedule?
The Pistons' are 8-3 since the ASB and have played just 4 teams with a winning record, two of them being the ~.500 Nets and the Oladipo-less Pacers. 7 of their final 15 games will be played against teams with a losing record as well, with two more games against the Pacers. Meanwhile, the Hornets post-ASB schedule only had them playing 9 games against sub .500 teams, and just one against a true tanking team in the Cavs. The Hornets are now 3-7 since the ASB. Even if the level of overall team performance hasn't changed, the difficulty of the Hornets' schedule could make it appear like they are "falling apart as a team" while the easiness of the Pistons' schedule makes it appear like they are "coming together as a team."
How much does this play into the attitudes of a team's free agents going into the offseason? My guess is that having a lighter post-ASB schedule and "coming together" gives a team more of an advantage in re-signing their own free agents and potentially even other free agents as opposed to struggling with a difficult post-ASB schedule. Have there been any studies on this?
The Pistons' are 8-3 since the ASB and have played just 4 teams with a winning record, two of them being the ~.500 Nets and the Oladipo-less Pacers. 7 of their final 15 games will be played against teams with a losing record as well, with two more games against the Pacers. Meanwhile, the Hornets post-ASB schedule only had them playing 9 games against sub .500 teams, and just one against a true tanking team in the Cavs. The Hornets are now 3-7 since the ASB. Even if the level of overall team performance hasn't changed, the difficulty of the Hornets' schedule could make it appear like they are "falling apart as a team" while the easiness of the Pistons' schedule makes it appear like they are "coming together as a team."
How much does this play into the attitudes of a team's free agents going into the offseason? My guess is that having a lighter post-ASB schedule and "coming together" gives a team more of an advantage in re-signing their own free agents and potentially even other free agents as opposed to struggling with a difficult post-ASB schedule. Have there been any studies on this?