Competitive imbalance.Mike G wrote:
Still, it's a bit dismaying how many regularly bad teams continue to be bad -- or even worse -- even those you'd think could hardly get any worse. Right now, Cha is headed for 13-53, Det the same, GS 19-47, NJ 12-54, Sac 17-49, Was 8-58 !
2012 predictions
Re: 2012 predictions
Re: 2012 predictions
Just a day later, significant improvements all around:Season at 13.2%
Code: Select all
7.23 JohnH 8.02 KP
7.52 J.E. 8.18 MG
7.59 ezPM 8.22 Vegas
7.70 Crow 8.33 DSM
7.71 ez2 8.38 zRA
7.74 dis 8.90 11py
Re: 2012 predictions
Now the avg error is 7.26, or twice the minimum possible (3.65), given the spread of predictions.Season is at .143, or 1/7
Code: Select all
6.69 JohnH 7.47 Vegas
6.93 ez2 7.47 KP
7.01 JE 7.55 zRA
7.02 ezPM 7.59 MG
7.06 Crow 7.90 DSM
7.12 dis 7.92 '11py
Re: 2012 predictions
Seems like it's shrinking so fast.
Re: 2012 predictions
Season at 15.5%
Code: Select all
6.42 JohnH 7.15 Vegas
6.65 JE 7.18 MG
6.80 ez2 7.31 KP
6.81 Crow 7.39 zRA
6.89 dis 7.70 DSM
6.90 ezPM 7.77 '11py
Re: 2012 predictions
Thanks for the updates.
Re: 2012 predictions
ah, this is more like it -The median hasn't changed, but the order has.
.182 of season
Code: Select all
6.37 JohnH 7.11 ezPM
6.61 J.E. 7.18 Vegas
6.84 MikeG 7.58 zRA
6.90 Crow 7.61 KevinP
7.04 dis 7.70 11Pyth
7.06 ez2 7.75 DSMok1
.182 of season
Re: 2012 predictions
At the quarterpole it might be nice to see more detail, i.e. the actual / pyth. projected win totals for the teams alongside the contestant projections and / or team by team variances between these two win figures for each contestant.
Re: 2012 predictions
Pyth+ is team's current wins + (Pythagorean W%) *(remaining games)
For 17 of 30 teams, we have all guessed too high or too low, and this is shown. As games are won and lost, these lines affect the magnitude, but not the ranking, of the predictions.
For the 13 other teams, where pyth+ is within the range of predictions, every game won or lost changes the average errors' ranking in the bottom line.John H is right on regarding Cha, while the rest of us were 4 to 15 wins too high.
For 17 of 30 teams, we have all guessed too high or too low, and this is shown. As games are won and lost, these lines affect the magnitude, but not the ranking, of the predictions.
For the 13 other teams, where pyth+ is within the range of predictions, every game won or lost changes the average errors' ranking in the bottom line.
Code: Select all
tm pyth+ all? DSM ezPM MG ez2 Vegas JH JE zRA dis Crow KP
Atl 47 lo 15 10 16 11 13 14 14 12 13 11 16
Bos 27 hi 9 15 14 16 12 16 15 18 13 14 8
Cha 13 8 11 9 11 4 0 5 11 9 5 15
Chi 54 lo 13 9 4 11 7 6 6 12 6 8 8
Cle 33 lo 12 14 12 11 17 15 15 7 14 15 11
Dal 43 5 1 1 0 1 3 0 0 1 2 6
Den 43 9 8 12 7 5 0 1 6 9 6 8
Det 14 hi 13 7 9 9 8 8 13 11 9 9 12
GSW 23 hi 9 6 6 6 4 3 6 5 10 4 3
Hou 28 hi 4 4 5 3 4 5 7 2 3 7 5
Ind 44 lo 10 12 6 11 7 8 13 11 9 7 11
LAC 40 3 3 2 1 3 1 0 6 2 1 0
LAL 42 2 1 3 0 7 2 0 1 6 1 8
Mem 30 hi 7 5 7 6 9 7 7 8 7 10 3
Mia 46 0 8 1 5 5 6 3 2 7 4 2
Mil 26 hi 7 5 4 6 6 8 6 7 5 7 6
Min 32 7 10 0 9 10 3 10 8 5 8 1
NJN 15 hi 12 9 9 10 12 13 7 11 7 9 14
NOH 21 4 4 0 5 3 1 3 6 3 6 10
NYK 32 hi 3 1 6 4 10 3 6 6 6 4 4
Orl 44 4 1 4 1 6 4 4 4 3 8 4
Phi 57 lo 22 21 23 21 21 20 18 21 23 20 21
Phx 28 1 7 5 4 2 4 1 0 1 0 0
Por 39 2 4 1 3 1 1 1 2 2 0 1
Sac 14 hi 15 13 16 12 7 11 6 11 11 9 12
SAS 45 lo 2 6 2 7 3 3 1 8 7 5 6
Okl 45 4 1 6 2 2 0 2 4 1 0 5
Tor 20 5 1 1 2 4 1 3 3 1 1 8
Uta 35 lo 7 10 5 9 9 8 10 8 6 9 5
Was 9 hi 15 7 13 10 11 13 12 14 11 13 10
err DSM ezPM MG ez2 Vegas JH JE zRA dis Crow KP
avg 7.00 7.7 7.1 6.7 7.1 7.1 6.3 6.5 7.5 7.0 6.8 7.5
Re: 2012 predictions
Thanks for the extra detail.
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2011 5:10 pm
- Contact:
Re: 2012 predictions
thx for updates. i'm surprised that i'm actually doing pretty well.
Re: 2012 predictions
So what you're telling us is that you're stoked? Are you from Northern California by any chance?
Re: 2012 predictions
Dude, you're right at the average.dudeimstoked wrote:thx for updates. i'm surprised that i'm actually doing pretty well.
But just like every year, it's amazing how little we can improve on just repeating the previous year's pythagorean W%. That 'prediction' would be next-to-last among our entries, and none of us are more than 1.3 wins closer to the mark than that.
While most of us have successfully predicted a few major advances and a few major declines, these are mostly offset by teams which should have gotten better but didn't; and others which should decline but just refuse to cooperate.
Predictions based strictly on a 'system' don't seem to fare any better than those based on gut feelings; but I suspect there's great advantage in having an inside track on developments like: who is showing up out of shape, who has been able to perfect some moves, etc.
In other words, there's no shame in losing to Hollinger here.
Update: errors up for almost everyone; now ranging from 6.33 to 8.11
Re: 2012 predictions
After a night of most teams doing what they're supposed to do, everyone looks better again.
Code: Select all
avg err avg err
5.80 JohnH 6.91 ezPM
6.39 J.E. 6.95 ez2
6.48 Crow 7.14 KevinP
6.52 MikeG 7.23 zRA
6.69 Vegas 7.41 11Pyth
6.81 dis 7.52 DSMok1
Re: 2012 predictions
This is one of the reasons whenever someone criticizes JH, I take issue with it. Dude knows what he's doing when it comes to this kind of stuff. Whether it's pure smarts or having the resources or whatever. Respect.