Why do NBA Stuffer and Basketball Reference have one pace rating for a team, while Hollinger and NBA.com have another pace rating for the same team and Team Rankings has yet another pace rating for the same team?
E.G. Philadelphia 76ers Pace Rating:
NBA Stuffer & Basketball Reference: 99.8
NBA.com & Hollinger: 102.4
Team Rankings: 105.1
Can anyone clue me into why there is such a discrepancy? Anyone know which is most accurate?
Thanks.
Pace Rating discrepencies
-
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2012 8:49 pm
- Location: Dallas, TX
Re: Pace Rating discrepencies
Can't say for sure without checking, but I'm guessing it's a possessions per 48 vs. possessions per game thing. I have no idea why there are three different ones though, perhaps some sites are more up to date than others.
Re: Pace Rating discrepencies
Team Ranking says per game while bball-ref is per 48, so that could be part of it. Bball-ref is the only one where I could (with a brief search) find any kind of methodology (http://www.basketball-reference.com/about/glossary.html). I'm guessing it's differences in how you count/weigh free throws and rebounds.
Re: Pace Rating discrepencies
The Sixers are averaging 48.88 minutes per game. This shows about twice the normal number of overtime minutes.
Still, that's just 1.018 X 48, or 1.8% more than 48.
The discrepancies shown are 2.6% more than b-r.com, and one is just about twice that.
Still, that's just 1.018 X 48, or 1.8% more than 48.
The discrepancies shown are 2.6% more than b-r.com, and one is just about twice that.
NBA Stuffer & Basketball Reference: 99.8
NBA.com & Hollinger: 102.4
Team Rankings: 105.1
Re: Pace Rating discrepencies
The value on BBRef uses a rather extended formula, whereas most people use something close to: pos = FGA + TOV -ORB + 0.44*FTA. Using this formula the pace value that Hollinger and NBA.com is correct as a per-48 value. I assume the BBRef one is correct according to their formula, and the Team Rankings one is probably per-game and uses a slightly larger FTA coeff - I would guess they use 0.5...
The BBR calculation can be found here: http://www.basketball-reference.com/abo ... .html#poss
The BBR calculation can be found here: http://www.basketball-reference.com/abo ... .html#poss
Re: Pace Rating discrepencies
I am surprised it isn't just the actual number of possessions, as gathered from bpb.
Then again, some might define fractional possessions at the end of quarters.
Then again, some might define fractional possessions at the end of quarters.
Re: Pace Rating discrepencies
This is what I was thinking too.jbrocato23 wrote: … I'm guessing it's a possessions per 48 vs. possessions per game thing
Thank you for the link and I should have known that TR was per game; I just didn’t think playing in some OT games would skew the # of possessions so much.xkonk wrote:Team Ranking says per game while bball-ref is per 48, so that could be part of it. Bball-ref is the only one where I could (with a brief search) find any kind of methodology (http://www.basketball-reference.com/about/glossary.html). I'm guessing it's differences in how you count/weigh free throws and rebounds.
Yes, this was confusing me in terms of the per game vs. per-48 stats; thought the discrepancy was too large; which is why I was unsure if TR was using per game #’s or just weighting things differently.Mike G wrote:The Sixers are averaging 48.88 minutes per game. This shows about twice the normal number of overtime minutes.
Still, that's just 1.018 X 48, or 1.8% more than 48.
The discrepancies shown are 2.6% more than b-r.com, and one is just about twice that.
Thanks V; I will move forward using the Hollinger and NBA #’s for my official numbers. Appreciate the link too.v-zero wrote:… Using this formula the pace value that Hollinger and NBA.com is correct as a per-48 value.
You and me both.Mike G wrote:I am surprised it isn't just the actual number of possessions, as gathered from bpb....