New Blog: Basketball Intelligence
Re: New Blog: Basketball Intelligence
Cavs,Lakers,Pistons,Hawks,Griz,OKC,Bucks,Bulls,Warriors,SW Div: http://basketballintelligence.wordpress ... orssw-div/
Re: New Blog: Basketball Intelligence
Cavs, Pacers, Blazers, Defense, Draft and Stash: http://basketballintelligence.wordpress ... aft-stash/
Re: New Blog: Basketball Intelligence
MIA,PHX,CHA,CLE,GSW,LAL,TOR,CHI,DEN,MIN: http://basketballintelligence.wordpress ... torchiden/
Re: New Blog: Basketball Intelligence
Chabdog interviewed us: http://chabdog.com/Interview-with-Ray-LeBov-7-28-14.pdf
Re: New Blog: Basketball Intelligence
Paul George, Jameer Nelson, OJ Mayo; http://basketballintelligence.wordpress ... n-oj-mayo/
Re: New Blog: Basketball Intelligence
Paul George,Dirk,DeMarcus, A Bennett,Randle: http://basketballintelligence.wordpress ... ettrandle/
Re: New Blog: Basketball Intelligence
Rockets, Grizz, Lakers, Raptors: https://basketballintelligence.wordpres ... s-raptors/
Re: New Blog: Basketball Intelligence
NBA Bigs, Bulls, Wizards, Suns,Nets, Magic, CBA, Analytics: http://basketballintelligence.wordpress ... analytics/
Re: New Blog: Basketball Intelligence
Hammon,Ibaka,Odom,Lowry,Kyle Anderson,Stretch 4s,Lakers,Scouting: https://basketballintelligence.wordpres ... g-success/
Re: New Blog: Basketball Intelligence
CLE, MIN, GSW, OKC, NOP, ORL, FIBA, Dragan Bender: http://basketballintelligence.wordpress ... an-bender/
Re: New Blog: Basketball Intelligence
The short article in Scientific American about using results from the combine compared to looking at college stats was especially interesting.rlee wrote:Hammon,Ibaka,Odom,Lowry,Kyle Anderson,Stretch 4s,Lakers,Scouting: https://basketballintelligence.wordpres ... g-success/
http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/bea ... a-success/
I don't know what the state of the art is in terms of projected NBA stats from college stats but according to that article, the physical and athletic measures from the combine do not lead to improved predictions.
The news about Hammon was both unexpected yet unsurprising. While Natalie Nakase has been pointedly slowly climbing the coaching ladder, Hammon's hiring was sudden and technically she's still a player right now. But OTOH, she's been a think-outside-the-box sort of player pretty much all her career, being overlooked in both high school and college despite stellar performances (I remember seeing her in an NCAA tournament game when she was at Colorado State), and joining the Russian team in order to play in the Olympics. And Popovich has consistently thumbed his nose at convention, being innovative in areas ranging from aggressively resting his star players (so aggressive that he was fined by the NBA during the 2012-13 season) to drafting more international players to, now, hiring a woman coach.
Re: New Blog: Basketball Intelligence
Cavs, Nets,Lakers,USAB,HOF,Analytics,3pt shooting: http://basketballintelligence.wordpress ... -shooting/
A highlight:
" One of the biggest difficulties in the field of basketball analytics is how to assign credit to individual players. In fact, some of the most contentious arguments in the field concern the proper allocation of credit for things we know have value on the team level. Dean Oliver’s Four Factors tell us that rebounding is pretty important at the team level. But how much of the value gained by the team is properly assignable to the player who so happens to secure that rebound? While forcing a change of possession with zero points scored is a great outcome for the defense, it doesn’t meet even passing scrutiny to give the rebounder full credit. What of the guy who challenged the initial shot? Or the player who boxed his man out to allow a teammate to snatch the board? It’s an interesting conundrum, but arguing the final points rapidly reaches diminishing returns in the absence of better input data to study."
A highlight:
" One of the biggest difficulties in the field of basketball analytics is how to assign credit to individual players. In fact, some of the most contentious arguments in the field concern the proper allocation of credit for things we know have value on the team level. Dean Oliver’s Four Factors tell us that rebounding is pretty important at the team level. But how much of the value gained by the team is properly assignable to the player who so happens to secure that rebound? While forcing a change of possession with zero points scored is a great outcome for the defense, it doesn’t meet even passing scrutiny to give the rebounder full credit. What of the guy who challenged the initial shot? Or the player who boxed his man out to allow a teammate to snatch the board? It’s an interesting conundrum, but arguing the final points rapidly reaches diminishing returns in the absence of better input data to study."
Re: New Blog: Basketball Intelligence
Cavs, Steph, Al Attles, World Cup, Rookies: http://basketballintelligence.wordpress ... p-rookies/
Re: New Blog: Basketball Intelligence
MEM,SAS,DET,BKN,NOP,HOU,PHX,CBA,D-League: http://basketballintelligence.wordpress ... ad-league/