Layne 0.887666481
Steve 0.551177824
Nick 0.839860748
Jesse 0.879277016
Mass 0.902710641
BPM 0.546599167
DE 0.817194972
Let's just say I'm shocked Kaminsky is ranked worse by the draft models than by the DX mock. I'm glad the mocks have moved him up so much the last few months, he has crushed it in my college player rankings for two seasons. He'll probably be between 4 to 7 in my draft model when done.
After seeing Steve's board, I started looking into Bobby Portis. Really impressed by what I see in him. Toughness, endless motor, good FT%, skilled passer by all accounts I read. He's long.
Ampersand, I copied and pasted your work into my own spreadsheet and then added Pelton, Andrew Johnson, and Layne's Humble model, though they don't all grade the same set of players. I also made a tab for where some Euro's and more unknown NCAA guys would rank amongst the main NCAA guys. I haven't updated those numbers with Jessie's rankings yet, but they should be pretty close to accurate. Here's a public link: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... edit#gid=0
Big time lurker who'd been compiling this on their own, thanks Ampersand for making it a lot easier. Let me know if there are any issues, I'll update the Euro numbers eventually.
I really like the NBA Draft, I also really like numbers. I try and write about the two of them here: wingspanaddicts.com
EvanZ wrote:After seeing Steve's board, I started looking into Bobby Portis. Really impressed by what I see in him. Toughness, endless motor, good FT%, skilled passer by all accounts I read. He's long.
This guy looks like he should be a top 10 pick.
I agree. Not that the models rank him that much lower, but I'm excited about his future.
Layne 0.887666481
Steve 0.551177824
Nick 0.839860748
Jesse 0.879277016
Mass 0.902710641
BPM 0.546599167
DE 0.817194972
Let's just say I'm shocked Kaminsky is ranked worse by the draft models than by the DX mock. I'm glad the mocks have moved him up so much the last few months, he has crushed it in my college player rankings for two seasons. He'll probably be between 4 to 7 in my draft model when done.
I think a few things are at play here.
- he's moved up considerably in mocks recently
- he isn't ranked that much lower
- Nick's model likely undervalues him because of his HS ranking
- there are less elite prospects at his age, so some of the regressions might be a bit wonky
nrestifo wrote:This all looks great. Thanks for putting it together. Any idea when it goes up?
No problem.
Everything is in the hands of DE now. I believe all of the editing is done and they are just figuring out how best to embed the chart. Could be 10 minutes, could be a week...
(I'm guessing probably tomorrow?)
Thanks everyone for your hardwork. I think it looks fantastic. I hope this not only leads to further publicity for all of the users involved and the APBR board as a whole, but it can serve as a launching pad for further discussion.