After losing game 1, the Cavs are given just a 13% chance to win the Finals, by b-r.com
This seems surprising, given their first 3 rounds' record. Through 14 games, they stack up against some of the best teams ever, in pt differential.
tm yr MOV
LAL 1987 15.1
Mil 1971 14.5
Chi 1996 13.4
Bos 1986 13.1
LAL 2001 12.7
Cle 2016 12.6
Den 2009 12.4
Chi 1991 12.1
Mia 2013 10.3
LAL 1985 10.2
http://bkref.com/tiny/Iacj5
All these were champs, except the 2009 Nuggets. That team beat NOH by 24 ppg, the Mavs by 8 ppg, and at 14 games, they'd outscored the Lakers by 2.5 ppg.
Cavs now with a 12% chance, according to b-r.com
Last year, the GSW were down 2-1, won the next 3.
In 2013, the Heat were down 2-1, and 3-2, won in 7.
2011, Mavs down 2-1, win the rest.
In 2006, Heat down 2-0 (and 2-1), win 4 straight.
Seems like it's not that unusual: 4 times in 10 years, 3 of the last 5.
A 30-point loss is still just one loss. Start the next game at 0-0.
Anyone have a prediction how this one is going to play out?
I'll say it goes 6 or 7.
In the interest of more comprehensive coverage, here are players who were in the top 20 in either Win Shares, eWins, or VORP for the playoffs.
Homemade/unauthorized Wins equivalents are generated from PER and BPM; xyz is then the average of the 4 Wins estimates.
The last 4 columns show which players are favored by which stats. BPM-Wins run 12-24% greater, because BPM considers level of competition. http://www.basketball-reference.com/pla ... anced.html
These 26 players account for 55-60% of 86 playoff games/wins.
Just looking at steals, rebounds, blocks seems wrong when there's a lot about defense we don't have to guess on anymore.
Defensively, Westbrook was really respectable this year, but he's not usually as good as his athleticism implies in the long-run. Kyrie also really dropped off in this post-season, although he's not usually that bad.