Near future for the Lakers?

Home for all your discussion of basketball statistical analysis.
jgoldstein34
Posts: 249
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2016 6:38 pm

Re: Near future for the Lakers?

Post by jgoldstein34 »

Yeah, your projection for his worth is way more optimistic than mine. I have him worth ~$7 million, if he gets a big offer sheet it is imperative that the Lakers let him walk. He's just not worth it.
EvanZ
Posts: 912
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 10:41 pm
Location: The City
Contact:

Re: Near future for the Lakers?

Post by EvanZ »

There are more things at play here.

I mean did you see Randle's instagram pics this summer? :lol:
Crow
Posts: 10533
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 11:10 pm

Re: Near future for the Lakers?

Post by Crow »

Ah, no. A two second google now didn't convince me.
JoshEngleman
Posts: 127
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2014 12:13 pm
Location: Wilmington, NC
Contact:

Re: Near future for the Lakers?

Post by JoshEngleman »

The Lakers need to get really, really lucky. The need the Pacers to bail them out. If you can get them to take Randle, Deng, #27 and #28, you do it. Getting out from Deng is key. Trading Randle is also smart, as it would keep them from overpaying him next year. Even though it's a sunk cost, bringing in George for something like this should improve the optics of losing next year's pick.

Image
Crow
Posts: 10533
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 11:10 pm

Re: Near future for the Lakers?

Post by Crow »

A great trade, Ball and a couple of other pickups that were sensible. Clarkson and Randle offered and a pretty good chance to be gone eventually. A fine start. And they know that a ton more work needs to be done.
Crow
Posts: 10533
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 11:10 pm

Re: Near future for the Lakers?

Post by Crow »

Pelinka wants 2 superstars. Will probably have to get in free agency. Probably 5 or less of current players (not counting draftees) will be around for their arrival and even less for any noisemaking thereafter.

George wants to come. But is he really the top or even a top Laker target? I'd look around hard and probably pick someone else.
jgoldstein34
Posts: 249
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2016 6:38 pm

Re: Near future for the Lakers?

Post by jgoldstein34 »

It sounds like the new Lakers front office's strategy is the same as the old: "we're the Lakers"
Crow
Posts: 10533
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 11:10 pm

Re: Near future for the Lakers?

Post by Crow »

They aren't really, yet; but have a better pitch with Magic and without Jim Buss.
Post Reply