On HOF and greatest lists
Re: On HOF and greatest lists
Curious but not enough to do X.
Re: On HOF and greatest lists
This is most of it (not in exact time order and with most tags stripped off):
Anchorage Man
@SethPartnow
·
Sep 21
This is the way.
Quote
Automatic
@automaticnba
·
Sep 21
Andre Iguodala thinks the hall of fame should have tiers and doesn't think he is a hall of famer.
Do you agree?
(via @OldManAndThree)
basketballstrategy
@bballstrategy
It is not the way.
I don't care about HOF, but I am not about one way official HOF tiers. You can have unofficial ones by amount of space and where fans go and what fans think.
But HOF voters are not to be trusted with tiers. Or 100% right even on one standard inductions.
#SoWizards the Podcast
@so_wizards
·
Sep 22
This. I mean, can we even trust voters on a straight yes/no vote?
basketballstrategy
Sep 22
Vern Mikkelsen, Larry Foust Bobby Wanzer in. Jim Pollard in with only 7 not that special seasons (very low ws/48 of .093). C Braun?
Will Shawn Marion make it?
Amar'e Stoudemire? Rondo? A Hardaway? Laimbeer, Marques Johnson? Haven't yet.
D Green, K Thompson, B Griffin, DeRozan
Do those last 4 deserve it? Will they get it? unclear what HOF voters will do.
How many tiers? 3? 3rd tier will be offended and some of tier 2. Drop some players.
Anybody under 75 or 85 ever heard of the first 5 HOF guys I mentioned?
Guy Rogers in with a ws/48 of just .056.
Shawn Kemp, Jermaine O'Neal, Walter Davis, Kevin Johnson, Horace Grant, Sam Cassell, Rasheed Wallace? "nah", not good enough. Not as good as Guy Rogers.
Tiering would expose major mistakes in induction.
Buck Williams or Jim Pollard?
With responsible tiering imo Pete Maravich probably belongs in lowest or next lowest tier.
Unofficial HOF tiers? If you want. I'd probably recommend divided into two groups: pre 1976 (or 1980) and afte.
I don't know the exact right amount of first quarter century of players to honor. The Naismith HOF may have a bit too many in retrospect.
But the bigger issue imo is too few modern players. And the bigger / better solution is expanding the NBA's own greatest list.
75 greatest at 75 years is too few imo. It "should" already be 100 or 125. I'd go to 100 by 2031, 125 by 2036 or no later than 2041 and probably 150 by 2046.
Tiering probably should be by eras. NBA has a top 75 tier and Naismith HOF has about 55 other NBAs I think. Sort of Tier 1 and Tier 2. Another tier would be created within Tier 1 when letting in 50-75 more by 2041.
If you decide the Hall of Fame should be top 3%, it should already be 150 NBA players. I'd get to top 200 way way before 200 years of NBA play. Probably by 125 years.
There were squabbles with NBA top 50 and top 75 and especially when anyone names a top 5 or 10.
I am not really into the squabble about the past. Squabble about today if you want. That is enough.
No sport HOF or any HOF uses multiple tiers to my knowledge.
Took them 2 decades to be shamed into inducting Artis Gilmore.
Naismith HOF doesn't deserve more responsibility, more legitimacy or prestige to decide tiers.
There is no way you'd get anything close to agreement on all-time top 10 or top 25. It is extremely unlikely anyone could fairly judge players from first 25 years to those from last 25.
You hear at least 4 or 5 common answers of who is number 1 and there will never be agreement on that.
Jokic has best career BPM of all-time and Kobe Bryant is 31st. Few voters are likely to vote near to these marks.
If Iguodala named his top 10, I would not be surprised if many people would disagree with 3 or more. Same with almost anybody.
If you had tiers stated at induction, some players might refuse induction or actively challenge it publicly.
It is a retirement gift and a brotherhood. Don't "need" tiers. That is an extracurricular activity for a modest number of fans.
Anchorage Man
@SethPartnow
·
Sep 21
This is the way.
Quote
Automatic
@automaticnba
·
Sep 21
Andre Iguodala thinks the hall of fame should have tiers and doesn't think he is a hall of famer.
Do you agree?
(via @OldManAndThree)
basketballstrategy
@bballstrategy
It is not the way.
I don't care about HOF, but I am not about one way official HOF tiers. You can have unofficial ones by amount of space and where fans go and what fans think.
But HOF voters are not to be trusted with tiers. Or 100% right even on one standard inductions.
#SoWizards the Podcast
@so_wizards
·
Sep 22
This. I mean, can we even trust voters on a straight yes/no vote?
basketballstrategy
Sep 22
Vern Mikkelsen, Larry Foust Bobby Wanzer in. Jim Pollard in with only 7 not that special seasons (very low ws/48 of .093). C Braun?
Will Shawn Marion make it?
Amar'e Stoudemire? Rondo? A Hardaway? Laimbeer, Marques Johnson? Haven't yet.
D Green, K Thompson, B Griffin, DeRozan
Do those last 4 deserve it? Will they get it? unclear what HOF voters will do.
How many tiers? 3? 3rd tier will be offended and some of tier 2. Drop some players.
Anybody under 75 or 85 ever heard of the first 5 HOF guys I mentioned?
Guy Rogers in with a ws/48 of just .056.
Shawn Kemp, Jermaine O'Neal, Walter Davis, Kevin Johnson, Horace Grant, Sam Cassell, Rasheed Wallace? "nah", not good enough. Not as good as Guy Rogers.
Tiering would expose major mistakes in induction.
Buck Williams or Jim Pollard?
With responsible tiering imo Pete Maravich probably belongs in lowest or next lowest tier.
Unofficial HOF tiers? If you want. I'd probably recommend divided into two groups: pre 1976 (or 1980) and afte.
I don't know the exact right amount of first quarter century of players to honor. The Naismith HOF may have a bit too many in retrospect.
But the bigger issue imo is too few modern players. And the bigger / better solution is expanding the NBA's own greatest list.
75 greatest at 75 years is too few imo. It "should" already be 100 or 125. I'd go to 100 by 2031, 125 by 2036 or no later than 2041 and probably 150 by 2046.
Tiering probably should be by eras. NBA has a top 75 tier and Naismith HOF has about 55 other NBAs I think. Sort of Tier 1 and Tier 2. Another tier would be created within Tier 1 when letting in 50-75 more by 2041.
If you decide the Hall of Fame should be top 3%, it should already be 150 NBA players. I'd get to top 200 way way before 200 years of NBA play. Probably by 125 years.
There were squabbles with NBA top 50 and top 75 and especially when anyone names a top 5 or 10.
I am not really into the squabble about the past. Squabble about today if you want. That is enough.
No sport HOF or any HOF uses multiple tiers to my knowledge.
Took them 2 decades to be shamed into inducting Artis Gilmore.
Naismith HOF doesn't deserve more responsibility, more legitimacy or prestige to decide tiers.
There is no way you'd get anything close to agreement on all-time top 10 or top 25. It is extremely unlikely anyone could fairly judge players from first 25 years to those from last 25.
You hear at least 4 or 5 common answers of who is number 1 and there will never be agreement on that.
Jokic has best career BPM of all-time and Kobe Bryant is 31st. Few voters are likely to vote near to these marks.
If Iguodala named his top 10, I would not be surprised if many people would disagree with 3 or more. Same with almost anybody.
If you had tiers stated at induction, some players might refuse induction or actively challenge it publicly.
It is a retirement gift and a brotherhood. Don't "need" tiers. That is an extracurricular activity for a modest number of fans.
Re: On HOF and greatest lists
HOF top tier has been around, called "first ballot HOF". Reggie Miller was consensus HOF but they decided it should be 2nd year of eligibility.
Guy Rodgers may be in due to one old APBR Yahoo-group mainstay, Bijan Bayne, who promoted ceaselessly. Largely based on ballhandling in the modern sense.
I advocated for Artis Gilmore, whose NBA-only career dwarfed most others. In 5 ABA years, he was quicker.
At one point, I made a semi-cynical comment that back in the day, if you played 10 years, you would be a candidate.
Some other old-timer declared without evidence that a college bench warmer in the 60s would be an NBA starter today. Because there are more teams now, and talent could not have increased, so the league is surely diluted now.
Jokic has "career" BPM of 9.4 thru age 27. Also ws/48 of .247 and PER 27.7
Jordan thru age 34 (Bulls career) was 10.2, .277, 29.1
LeBron thru age 28 was 9.3, .241, 27.6 -- nearly identical to Joker -- in regular seasons.
Guy Rodgers may be in due to one old APBR Yahoo-group mainstay, Bijan Bayne, who promoted ceaselessly. Largely based on ballhandling in the modern sense.
I advocated for Artis Gilmore, whose NBA-only career dwarfed most others. In 5 ABA years, he was quicker.
At one point, I made a semi-cynical comment that back in the day, if you played 10 years, you would be a candidate.
Some other old-timer declared without evidence that a college bench warmer in the 60s would be an NBA starter today. Because there are more teams now, and talent could not have increased, so the league is surely diluted now.
Jokic has "career" BPM of 9.4 thru age 27. Also ws/48 of .247 and PER 27.7
Jordan thru age 34 (Bulls career) was 10.2, .277, 29.1
LeBron thru age 28 was 9.3, .241, 27.6 -- nearly identical to Joker -- in regular seasons.
Re: On HOF and greatest lists
It turns out that the great players' career averages tend to top out around age 30. Jokic and Giannis are still pushing their career averages up; Durant and Curry are hardly diminishing at 34.
Lists are from alltime leaders in BPM; and in Win Shares; only looking at careers mostly or entirely since 1974.
https://www.basketball-reference.com/le ... areer.html
* - Kareem's career BPM excludes seasons before 1974, when his WS/48 were about .040 higher.
Malone = Karl
Code: Select all
BPM player age WS/48 player age PER player age
11.0 Jordan 27 .293 Kareem 25 30.2 Jordan 27
9.4 Jokic 27 .277 Jordan 33 28.4 Shaq 30
9.3 LeBron 29 .261 Robinson 32 27.8 Robinson 32
8.7 Robinson 32 .251 Paul 32 27.8 LeBron 29
8.4 * Kareem 30 .247 Jokic 27 27.7 Jokic 27
8.1 Paul 31 .243 LeBron 29 27.4 Kareem 25
7.6 Magic 31 .232 Shaq 30 27.4 Davis 26
7.4 Bird 31 .227 Harden 30 26.6 Wade 30
7.3 Stockton 32 .227 Duncan 28 25.7 Paul 31
7.3 Wade 30 .226 Magic 31 25.3 Duncan 28
7.0 Harden 30 .226 Barkley 29 25.3 Barkley 29
6.9 Durant 29 .222 Kawhi 29 25.3 Durant 29
6.9 Kawhi 29 .221 Nowitzki 29 24.9 Giannis 28
6.8 Barkley 29 .219 Durant 29 24.8 Harden 30
6.6 Curry 32 .219 Davis 26 24.5 Olajuwon 33
6.5 Shaq 30 .217 Bird 31 24.4 Malone 37
6.4 Garnett 31 .212 Malone 37 24.4 McGrady 24
6.4 McGrady 25 .210 Stockton 38 24.3 Olajuwon 31
6.3 Davis 26 .208 Curry 29 24.2 Magic 31
6.3 Duncan 28 .205 Wade 30 24.2 Bird 31
https://www.basketball-reference.com/le ... areer.html
* - Kareem's career BPM excludes seasons before 1974, when his WS/48 were about .040 higher.
Malone = Karl
Re: On HOF and greatest lists
Did not know of Bijan Bayne or such discussions or that specific advocacy. Looked briefly at things written by or about him. There was a period before I became aware of APBR, though I got here relatively early. I barely know a little of the History wing. I only rarely looked at Ring of Honor stuff.
Yeah, peaks and timing of them and tail trends and lengths all play a part of the view / opinions.
Yeah, peaks and timing of them and tail trends and lengths all play a part of the view / opinions.
Re: On HOF and greatest lists
Ring of Honor?
Re: On HOF and greatest lists
It was the APBRmetrics re-do of HOF voting by year, done in a separate sub-forum of the previous version of this forum, mostly by a few.
Re: On HOF and greatest lists
According to b-r.com, probabilities that some players should be elected to the Hall of Fame:
https://www.basketball-reference.com/le ... _prob.html
They didn't get asterisks by the most recent inductees yet; some of these are in, I believe.
Code: Select all
prob. current prob. retired
1.00 LeBron James 1.00 Dwight Howard
1.00 Kevin Durant .984 Carmelo Anthony
1.00 Chris Paul .946 Vince Carter
1.00 Dwyane Wade .942 Larry Foust
1.00 Steph Curry .934 Pau Gasol
1.00 James Harden .844 Chauncey Billups
1.00 Russell Westbrook .756 Shawn Marion
.986 Anthony Davis .729 Amar'e Stoudemire
.964 Damian Lillard .509 LaMarcus Aldridge
.949 Giannis A. .506 Joe Johnson
.936 Paul George .385 Shawn Kemp
.935 Kyrie Irving .324 John Wall
.864 Nikola Jokic .318 Jermaine O'Neal
.857 Kyle Lowry .311 Walter Davis
.777 Kawhi Leonard .287 Penny Hardaway
.768 Draymond Green .261 Bill Laimbeer
.735 Kevin Love .252 Marques Johnson
.730 Jimmy Butler .218 Gene Shue
.702 Klay Thompson .217 Gilbert Arenas
.606 Rajon Rondo .191 Kevin Johnson
.548 Blake Griffin .183 Mark Price
.424 DeMar DeRozan .177 Norm Nixon
.216 Rudy Gobert .156 Brad Daugherty
.151 Kemba Walker .152 Horace Grant
.127 Andre Iguodala .127 Paul Silas
.122 Al Horford .126 M.R. Richardson
.108 Karl-A Towns .116 Willie Naulls
.105 Derrick Rose .113 Gus Williams
They didn't get asterisks by the most recent inductees yet; some of these are in, I believe.
Re: On HOF and greatest lists
.75 guys probably make it. .5 probably won't. .6 might in some cases.
Re: On HOF and greatest lists
From a list of top 40 career playoff minutes; 20 who were their teams' Main Man for a significant part of their careers.
Showing playoff series wins and losses; and game W and L. Ranked by PO games won.
https://www.basketball-reference.com/le ... eer_p.html
Among the top 20 in minutes but never The Man: Pippen, Parker, DJ, Havlicek, Fisher, Horry, Stockton.
Steph Curry trails only Bill Russell in series Win%. Essentially tied with Magic for game W%
Chris Paul alone at the bottom in series W%.
Showing playoff series wins and losses; and game W and L. Ranked by PO games won.
Code: Select all
goat sW sL gW gL sW% gW%
LeBron 41 12 182 100 .774 .645
Duncan 35 13 157 94 .729 .625
Kareem 37 12 154 83 .755 .650
Kobe 33 10 135 85 .767 .614
Shaq 32 13 129 87 .711 .597
Magic 32 8 128 62 .800 .674
Jordan 30 7 119 60 .811 .665
Russell 27 2 107 58 .931 .648
Wade 22 10 105 72 .688 .593
Durant 22 10 101 65 .688 .608
goat sW sL gW gL sW% gW%
Curry 23 5 99 48 .821 .673
Bird 23 9 99 65 .719 .604
Malone 19 19 98 95 .500 .508
Wilt 18 11 88 72 .621 .550
West 16 12 87 66 .571 .569
Harden 15 14 85 75 .517 .531
Olajuwon 16 13 76 69 .552 .524
Paul 12 15 76 73 .444 .510
Drexler 16 14 74 71 .533 .510
Nowitzki 13 14 69 76 .481 .476
Among the top 20 in minutes but never The Man: Pippen, Parker, DJ, Havlicek, Fisher, Horry, Stockton.
Steph Curry trails only Bill Russell in series Win%. Essentially tied with Magic for game W%
Chris Paul alone at the bottom in series W%.
-
- Posts: 116
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2021 1:24 am
Re: On HOF and greatest lists
It would be interesting to analyze how many of the Top 40 in career playoff minutes were on the same team. How often were some of the most prominent playoff performers on the same team?Mike G wrote: ↑Fri Oct 20, 2023 9:08 pm From a list of top 40 career playoff minutes; 20 who were their teams' Main Man for a significant part of their careers.
Showing playoff series wins and losses; and game W and L. Ranked by PO games won.https://www.basketball-reference.com/le ... eer_p.htmlCode: Select all
goat sW sL gW gL sW% gW% LeBron 41 12 182 100 .774 .645 Duncan 35 13 157 94 .729 .625 Kareem 37 12 154 83 .755 .650 Kobe 33 10 135 85 .767 .614 Shaq 32 13 129 87 .711 .597 Magic 32 8 128 62 .800 .674 Jordan 30 7 119 60 .811 .665 Russell 27 2 107 58 .931 .648 Wade 22 10 105 72 .688 .593 Durant 22 10 101 65 .688 .608 goat sW sL gW gL sW% gW% Curry 23 5 99 48 .821 .673 Bird 23 9 99 65 .719 .604 Malone 19 19 98 95 .500 .508 Wilt 18 11 88 72 .621 .550 West 16 12 87 66 .571 .569 Harden 15 14 85 75 .517 .531 Olajuwon 16 13 76 69 .552 .524 Paul 12 15 76 73 .444 .510 Drexler 16 14 74 71 .533 .510 Nowitzki 13 14 69 76 .481 .476
Among the top 20 in minutes but never The Man: Pippen, Parker, DJ, Havlicek, Fisher, Horry, Stockton.
Steph Curry trails only Bill Russell in series Win%. Essentially tied with Magic for game W%
Chris Paul alone at the bottom in series W%.
Also, for something like this, I prefer looking at Win Shares (WS) and WS/48, rather raw Wins/Losses or W%.
Re: On HOF and greatest lists
Well that just takes one click --
https://www.basketball-reference.com/le ... eer_p.html
-- and from there any other click.
What I did was look up each player and summarize.
A few years ago, I determined that the Bulls from 1991-98 had a very similar series W-L to what the Celtics had in Russell's career (1957-69). And so, 6 NBA titles in the '90s looks roughly as good as 11 in the '50s-60s; in terms of how many other teams they had to beat.
Wanting to get LeBron et al in there, I did it more comprehensively this time.
Of course this includes off-peak performances, too. Jordan started out 0-3 in series.
https://www.basketball-reference.com/le ... eer_p.html
-- and from there any other click.
What I did was look up each player and summarize.
A few years ago, I determined that the Bulls from 1991-98 had a very similar series W-L to what the Celtics had in Russell's career (1957-69). And so, 6 NBA titles in the '90s looks roughly as good as 11 in the '50s-60s; in terms of how many other teams they had to beat.
Wanting to get LeBron et al in there, I did it more comprehensively this time.
Of course this includes off-peak performances, too. Jordan started out 0-3 in series.