The Spurs have outscored playoff opponents by 8 ppg. Miami has been better by 7 ppg. Next best is the Clipps at +2.0
But how do they rank when you consider the competition?
There are a few ways to do this; but relative to their playoff opponents' regular-season SRS, they rank like this:
Code: Select all
2014 season - playoffs - - - - - - - - - - - -
Team SRS MOV oppSRS SRS diff impr
SAS 8.00 8.0 4.59 12.59 4.59 82.5
LAC 7.27 2.0 5.85 7.85 .58 7.5
Mia 4.15 7.0 .69 7.69 3.54 53.1
Dal 2.91 -2.0 8.00 6.00 3.09 21.6
Hou 5.06 .3 4.44 4.74 -.32 -1.9
Okl 6.66 -1.0 5.63 4.63 -2.03 -38.7
Was .48 .9 2.53 3.43 2.95 32.4
GSW 5.15 -4.5 7.27 2.77 -2.38 -16.7
Team SRS MOV oppSRS SRS diff impr
Atl -.88 -1.0 3.63 2.63 3.51 24.6
Brk -1.58 -1.3 3.22 1.92 3.50 42.0
Mem 2.18 -5.4 6.66 1.26 -.92 -6.4
Por 4.44 -6.2 6.40 .20 -4.24 -46.7
Ind 3.63 -1.0 1.14 .14 -3.49 -66.4
Tor 2.55 -1.6 -1.58 -3.18 -5.73 -40.1
Chi 1.20 -4.6 .48 -4.12 -5.32 -26.6
Cha -.89 -9.8 4.15 -5.65 -4.76 -19.0
avg 3.15 -1.26 3.94 2.68 -.47 .08
Columns: RS SRS, PO margin of victory, PO opponents' (games weighted) RS SRS, PO SRS = MOV + oppSRS, diff = PO SRS - RS SRS , impr = diff * G
The averages are for all teams weighed equally.
Multiplied by games, the Pacers are these playoffs biggest underachievers, in points for/against, relative to their regular season.
The Clipps handled the Warriors by 4.5 ppg and then were outscored by the Thunder by 1 ppg.